Tuesday, November 10, 2020

Trump's Sea Change

 
Trump began a sea change that will not cease with his presidency; he questioned basic assumptions that have taken hold in American society that should have been rejected long ago.

 
He challenged the elitism of the Democrats, declaring that putting American businesses and jobs first is more important that the elitist globalization that liberals tout - liberals pretend to be open minded, but really are just aligning with elitists in other countries. 
 
I know, I grew up liberal.
 
President Trump cares about poor Americans and the working class, whereas liberals care about exotic people in other countries, thus jettisoning responsibility for one’s American neighbor. 
 
He is empowering people from all strata to work hard and reap the benefits of one's efforts in a capitalist and free market system, a challenge to the culture of victim mentality that is so prevalent in liberal society today. This has included prison reform.
 
Prison reform was his statement that everyone can use his or her potential for the good, that the down and out can rise above their mistakes and achieve. But liberals like victims and sneered at Trump's prison reform. This kind of liberal sneering at what should have been a liberal cause serves as yet another wake up call - liberals are not liberal.
 
President Trump valiantly declared a pro-life position that even most pro-choicers prefer - no abortion after the unborn child can feel pain. 
 
At a UN conference in 2019, President Trump called for the de-criminalization of homosexuality world wide. This sent a shock wave among traditionalists; he has softened traditionalists' stance on homosexuality - the Bible may forbid it, but gays need not be persecuted. Again, Trump wants everyone working at his or her top functioning, gays included. 

I blink away tears as I write about the Abraham Peace Accords in which President Trump brokered peace deals between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco. We cannot thank him enough for this, here in Israel. He moved the Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, looks like that really did soften the environment here and prepare this region for peace. 

We cannot comprehend the horrors that exist in China right now, it is slowly coming out that the Uighurs, Muslims of Turkish origin, are being persecuted for their faith, abortion and sterilization is being forced upon Uighur women, children are separated from their parents and put into communist kindergartens to unlearn their traditions and be brainwashed, grieving for their lost parents all the while! 
 
But why did we not protest when the majority Han population was being pressured to have only one child to the point of forced abortions? Because us enlightened liberals had been conditioned to think that only white people are racist, that all evil stemmed from European colonialism, so we could not recognize evil when perpetrated by non-white peoples. 

In Maxine Hong Kingston's excellent books, "The Woman Warrior" and "China Man", she writes that Chinese culture has traditionally viewed non Chinese as "ghosts", as not human. Perhaps this is why the Chinese government suppressed telling the world about the covid 19, maybe non-whites can be racist as well, maybe their racism is the deadliest form. But - the liberal holds that only whites are racist.

We forgot how to recognize evil. We forgot to judge by the content of one's character. President Trump remembered!

In a world of political correctness in which people are afraid to speak, President Trump began momentum that others ran with - Trump is not a man of words, he was unable to articulate his positions in a polished enough manner, but so what? This is a reflection of his sincerity. Others drew from his strength - Diamond and Silk, Candace Owens, Brandon Straka, Brandon Tatum, Kanye West, are noteworthy activists who have articulated what president Trump began. 
 
While liberals bow to rioters and violence that they declare to be "understandable", usually declaring this from their posh homes, President Trump feels the pain of the small business owner and homeowner whose livelihoods and neighborhoods have been vandalized, all supported by a liberal ideology that believes that “victims” have the right to loot. It is liberals who are actually prejudicial in this regard. Liberals think that they can attend college, make something of themselves, but that those pitiable people of color and residents of third world countries just cannot manage and need liberals to save them. That is neocolonialism and racist.
 
President Trump believes that all people can maximize their potential and put their talents to good use. That is the ultimate non-racist stance - you can achieve, no matter your circumstances.
 
President Trump expects every leader to help his or her people. Liberals are really the racists in declaring that all must flee to a border-free USA, basically liberals are assuming that Latin Americans are incapable of correct governance, right? Persecution is oh so natural south of the Mexican border - that liberal attitude is racist. Again, liberals are declaring this open-border policy from behind locked doors and zoned neighborhoods - zoning IS a wall. 
 
Trump has insisted that world leaders also put their own countries first, as he does. This is correct nationalism - loving your neighbor.  

In his support for school vouchers, President Trump challenged the idea that American children must be at the mercy of indoctrination in the public school system. 
 
---
 
The storming of the Capitol, January 6 2021, was a tragic end to the above, and at times men must fall, as the Word of God anticipates, but President Trump did not call for violence that day, and that too must be remembered

 

Liberal Culture and what you are not Allowed to Say

Liberal privilege: let's pretend the family is not important.
 
"Family values": liberals sneer at this, yet reap its benefits.
 
A white liberal in a nice suburb who has a mother and father figure regards her family situation as a stroke of luck, not as a result of family values. 
 
Liberals are prevented from vocalizing the following thought: “the stability I enjoy stems from having two parents who have different roles in the home.” - that would be sexist. They cannot verbalize: “My parent’s devotion to each other and refusal to engage in extramarital affairs is part of my stability” - that would be sexual repression. They could not say: "hard work can get you the American Dream" - that would be ignoring the injustices of "the system" that oppresses minorities.
 
Calls to blame "the system" drowned out one's ability to learn how to have a stable marriage and how to parent positively, it drowned out recognizing the importance of limiting sexual behavior, and drowned out the work ethic.
 
White liberal teens in Brookline Massachusetts in the 1970’s and 80’s went to late night parties, used substances from alcohol to marijuana to harder drugs, engaged in sex play, and returned home to sober, devoted parents who had different roles in the home, in their generation had remained chaste until marriage (or had few partners and started sexual activity at an older age), and who had solid careers that demanded a work ethic and enabled them to afford suburban living. 
 
Liberals teens were not even allowed to connect the dots: different roles in the home, sobriety, limits on sexual behavior, and a work ethic may be part of the stability we were enjoying. There were too many social taboos on speech - don’t be sexist! don’t be sexually repressed! don't suggest that the poor can work their way up!… that prevented us from appreciating what we inherited right before our very eyes. 
 
Then came the date rapes, college years. 
 
Date rapes were blamed on "the system", on "rape culture" - vague, amorphous, unreachable, no one taught us that
you can avoid this. We were told we had to fight an huge "rape culture". This is undoable, and amounts to a victim mentality, plain and simple.
 
We enjoyed the benefits of our parents' chastity or at least lack of the kind of promiscuity that was happening, of hard work, of gender roles, of sobriety, yet were not allowed to comprehend them, verbalize them, live them, and pass them down to the next generation.
 
Teach your kids: wait til marriage or wait until a mature, healthy and committed relationship until you engage in sex play and sexual activity, work hard on a focused goal for your career, and a strong family unit will probably end up involving gender roles in the context of constant and open communication with your spouse, but that will not stop you from achieving a solid career - look at ACB! 
 

 

Pro Lifers and Pro Choicers Can Agree on the Following in Light of Woman's Choice

 
ProChoice advocates should question what abortion has become, on the grounds of Woman's Choice.
 
Ruth Bader Ginsburg saved at least one baby because the military pressured Capt Susan Struck to resign when she became pregnant. RBG's efforts on Struck's behalf resulted in the military changing its policy and not forcing women to resign due to pregnancy.
 
As she was in favor of woman's choice and woman’s equality, we can emulate RBG's stance to demand real choices:
 
- Abortion clinics must also offer services that assist with adoption, fostering, and assisted parenting. 
 
 - Abortion clinics should demand proper health care for the woman throughout the abortion procedure (no checking into a motel for late-term abortions and birthing a dead fetus alone).
 
- Counselors at abortion clinics should check if the woman is being pressured by boyfriends or husbands to abort
 
- Abortion clinics should provide informed consent for procurement of fetal parts for medical research, which involves abortion procedures that are riskier to the woman.
 
 
- Counselors at abortion clinics should challenge the use of abortion as a means of gender selection or genocide, for example, the forced abortions upon the Muslim Uighur women by the Chinese government, and to resist the abortion industry targeting minority women in the USA. 
 
- Abortion is permissible if the woman's life is in danger due to the pregnancy. This does not diminish the humanity of the unborn. In any case when there is danger to life, exceptions are made: think of the "women and children first" value in the west, that means, if the Titanic is sinking, you save the women and children first, that does not mean that men are not worthy, alive, and human.  

- Show her the ultrasound. There are women who are saying, after abortion, that they were lied to vis a vis fetal development.
 
 1 - Woman’s choice
 
It has come to light that Planned Parenthood only offers abortion as a choice for an unplanned pregnancy and, once women enter their clinic, actively pressures women to abort. This is not choice. Those who are pro-choice should agree to mandatory offering of real choices to all women at all abortion clinics, including adoption, foster care, and parenting help.
 
2 - Woman’s choice regarding the abortion procedure
 
The woman undergoing an abortion should be informed if the doctor plans to harvest the unborn’s organs for medical usage. The use of mechanical and medicinal cervical dilators such as misoprostol (in order for the fetus to be evacuated intact) pose an increased risk to the woman and this should be made clear to her. It should be her choice if the organs will be used, or if the unborn will be buried or cremated according with her faith tradition.
 
3 - Woman’s choice and woman’s equality re: pressure from one’s place of work
 
Ruth Bader Ginsberg saved one baby because the military pressured Capt Susan Struck to resign when she became pregnant. RBG's efforts on Struck's behalf resulted in the military changing its policy and not forcing women to resign due to pregnancy. Woman’s choice prevailed over boss’ choice, and woman’s equality prevailed over being fired for being pregnant, as only a woman can become pregnant.
 
We should agree that no woman should be pressured to abort by her place of work, college administration, or family members.
 
4 - Woman’s equality re: gender selection
 
Abortion should never occur due to gender selection, as that is not woman’s equality. More female babies are aborted than male babies, and Planned Parenthood does not discourage women from getting an abortion even if they declare that they are seeking an abortion if it is a girl. Concepts of woman’s equality should stop this.
 
5 - Woman’s choice, not government’s choice
 
Those who are pro-choice are certainly pro woman’s choice and not "government’s choice". The Chinese government is forcing abortions on its Muslim Uighur population as a form of population control. Pro choice voices should be loud and clear against any government forcing women to have abortions.
 
6 - Woman’s choice not doctor’s choice due to classism and racism
 
Keisha Atkins was encouraged by an abortion doctor during a mere 20 minute interview to get an abortion partly because she was Latina (sic) and blue collar. This is classist and racist.
 
7 - Proper health care during the abortion procedure
 
Keisha Atkins died of complications following a late term abortion due to medical neglect. It is coming to light that there is serious medical neglect occurring in many abortion clinics. We should all agree that abortion clinics should have hospital admitting privileges, that women should not be delivering late term babies alone in hotel rooms, all people across the spectrum should demand proper and externally audited medial care for the woman who does have an abortion.
 
An unspoken issue: the sexually active may get pregnant.
 
Awareness needs to be raised that birth control methods are not 100% effective. Getting pregnant can happen while using birth control. This may result in wiser choices regarding birth control (say, a rhythm method coupled with a barrier method for maximum effectiveness), a more mature attitude when entering a sexual relationship, or the decision to abstain.
 
Pro choice means informed choices
.
Ben Watson, former NFL champion and pro-life activist, has called for respectful dialogue between the pro-life and pro-choice camps. (See clips at end, where I post the time in the clips where he calls for dialogue.) This inspired me to write this post.
 
There are some issues that members of both camps can agree upon to curtail abortion. 
 

Clips of Ben Watson speaking at an advocate for pro-life as well as respectful dialogue:
 

 

What They Meant at the Dawn of Roe V Wade.....

 
I am here to tell you what liberals had in mind when they supported abortion rights in the wake of Roe Vs Wade, 1973, as this is my mother's generation.
 
What they meant:
 
Few women would have an abortion: it would be rare.
 
It would be very early in a pregnancy, that is, a woman would find out she was pregnant, say, oops this was unplanned, and have the abortion very soon, way before the end of the first trimester.
 
It would never be used to for gender selection. It would not be pushed on blacks and other minority groups.
 
No woman would be pressured by anyone to abort, it would be the Woman's Choice.
 
It would not be used to eradicate those with Down's syndrome or spina bifida or any other disease.
 
The woman would relate to such an abortion as she would to a late period. It would not cause her any psychological or physical harm.
 
Abortion would not lead to promiscuous sex.
 
Using fetal parts for medical research was unthinkable. They never would have dreamed of this.
 
The above in a nutshell is what those liberals meant, half a century ago.
 
What abortion has become:
 
Some women have had multiple abortions. Abortion has affected women psychologically in ways that were not anticipated. Some women have died because of complications during the abortion procedure. Abortionists are pushing abortion onto women. In the Keisha Atkins case, Keisha was pressured to abort her late term baby in part because she was blue collar and Latina - that is racism and classism. Abortion sends the message that you must be perfect to be a perfect parent, which is untrue. Abortion has given people excuses not to support the perinatal woman, or anyone needing aid, as people became trained to think, "see these neglected or abused kids? She should have had an abortion", thus creating a callous society. 
 
Abortion has created a culture of ableism.
 
Abortion has wounded our generation in more ways than we can count.
 
This is why many who agreed whole-heartedly with the rape exception are throwing up their hands and saying: this has gone too far, even for rape I oppose abortion.
 
The abortionist extremists are the ones who brought total bans to abortions upon society. (Abortionist extremists support abortion up to birth, for any reason, no other options offered at clinics.)
 
And the prolifers who allow no exception will watch this swing, yet again, to pro-abortion extremism. 

A middle ground would have prevented this.

Here is a proposed middle ground - abortion only up to 12 weeks, like Switzerland, and a social worker must approve the request. 
 
Up to 12 weeks should cover most rapes. Pro-life activists then raise awareness about the sanctity of life such that most women will not choose abortion, even in the case of rape. 
 
Up to 12 weeks would make gender and ableist selection impossible. 
 
No more targeting minority groups! 
 
Abortion clinics would be departments in hospitals, not independent businesses! These departments offer referral to adoption and fostering choices, and counseling to combine forms of birth control for the next sexual encounter, such as the rhythm method and barrier method. 
 
This compromise makes me queasy even as I write it - 12 weeks is in fact late in gestation.
 

 
 Do Women Have A Right To Make Reproductive Health Decisions? | Youth Ki  Awaaz
 

 

Marxist Dialectic and the Activism it Begets

 

 When the goal is to create change through social discord, that is Marxist dialectic.
 
Marxist dialectic is the hallmark of socialism and communism. It has found its way into the liberal camp of late. It produces a tiny elite, and most will suffer from it.

But many think they can be a part of that elite. Most cannot, because elite positions are by definition limited.
 
The pretense is that there is a goal to the activism, so activists engage to achieve that goal.
 
But then the goal posts change. You have now entered Marxist dialectic in which the goal is actually constant discord and flux, toppling the establishment of the day to be replaced by another establishment that will be toppled tomorrow
 
The naive fought for a cause and then themselves were toppled, they are bewildered that now they tables are turned on them.
 
You are not likely to float to the top and be in control of such activism. Marxist dialectic boasts few leaders, and many who find themselves pushed aside after having devoted themselves to such and such a cause, they are out in the cold. Bewildered, they cannot grasp what happened to them.
 
What happened is that they were pawns in Marxist dialectic. They were never going to reap the benefits of the revolution they thought they were waging. 
 
Here is an example. A fair minded person can be for abortion rights, even if they are not comfortable with abortion. These rights were achieved, up until fetal viability. Most people could live with this.
 
Done.
 
There is no reason for abortion for gender selection! No reason up until birth!
 
Now, leftists are pushing something that even avid pro-choicers wince at.
 
Reasonable people supported legal access to abortion, even those whose conscience it pricked.
 
Leftists swooped in and have now created a fight for abortion up until the point of birth, which even their former supporters are defecting from. 
 
But such defection pleases Leftist activists, as that creates a larger battleground. 
 
They are in it for the fight.
 
You are likely to be one of their victims.
 
Resist it.
 
 

Liberal Living in Strategic Opposition to the Other - it Damages your Interpersonal Skills

Liberals live in strategic positions in opposition to an Other. 
 
That is, they build platforms in opposition.
 
That “Other” is a real or imagined Establishment.
 
They shape you into social soldiers, ruining your interpersonal skills.
 
It was the Christians who showed by personal example that there was another path. 
 
First, let me describe what it is like to grow up in the Liberal "belly of the beast".
 
This so called Establishment is often ill defined, amorphous, so huge you cannot grasp it and certainly not do much to challenge it. This liberal myth leaves people feeling either helpless or bitter.
 
This liberal-left myth wants to engage you in an endless battle to topple far away “isms” so that you are endlessly fighting, never achieving, and always feeling battle weary. It pits you against people who should be your friends and neighbors. You converse with people on hot topics that push people’s buttons and estrange people from each other.
 
This only works for the elite! It will not work for most people!
I grew up in the liberal “belly of the beast” in Brookline Massachusetts, so I bear witness.
 
The constellation of myths that there are lots of “isms” out there that you must be bitter about, frightened of, and engage with people on these topics in every interpersonal interaction that you have, only works for the people who are benefiting from these mythologies: college and university professors, paid activists, lawyers, journalists.
If you are not one of these professionals directly benefiting from the promotion of liberal mythologies, your interpersonal relationships will be severely damaged as you wage your constant battles that the liberal left programs you to do.
 
Professor Jordan Petersen has wisely noted this.
 
Here is an example regarding racism, which the Left holds is the only social problem.
 
Slavery in the USA was racist, it resulted in beatings, inhumane treatment, and lack of personal freedom and the right of every human being to chart their own course in life.
 
Christians, in the name of Biblical teachings, formed the underground railroad. They both quietly and openly challenged slavery, and it came to an end.
 
Blacks continued to be disadvantaged, racism that led to injustice was still an issue. People thus continued to advocate for civil rights and America weaned itself off racism by leaps and bounds - we were not told that these many of these advocates were religious Christians.
 
Lyndon B Johnson created welfare policies, with the myth that this was good for the Black community - but these policies resulted in poor men encouraged to be absent so that mothers could collect welfare - many of these families were Black.
 
We “enlightened” Brookline liberals were very open minded, you see, we thought that Blacks have children out of wedlock a lot because they inherited this from African culture. They were thus doomed to live like this. That is total nonsense, it was the Democrats that broke up the Black family.
 
We had Affirmative Action, which ended up lowering standards of education and making White students end up resenting the Black students who got accepted to college despite having lower grades and lower standardized test scores. I did not know that there had been Black leaders who fiercely opposed the standard lowering that is inherent in Affirmative Action - one such professor was fired from Cornell University for her integrationist views - see Allan Bloom’s book, “The Closing of the American Mind” for more.
 
Still, we thought we were open minded.
 
We had a Black president for two terms.
 
Despite all the strides, the Left has come up with a new twist - “subconscious bias”. That means no matter how open minded you act, you may still be subtlety racist.
 
The Left always want to hunt out your racism (never theirs). I am a witness to this, and their set of myths ruins people. It makes you think that there are endless social atrocities happening, that every conversation you have must involve controversial issues that assume the worst of anyone who does not agree with the latest politically correct accusation.
 
Many young women I know in Brookline High developed abrasive personalities in light of the constant call to fight. They neglected their appearance in the name of feminism. Only a very few charismatic, talented young women succeeded as they waged constant social battles, please note that those who succeeded attained influential positions in ways that most people will not. As it was unacceptable for feminists to care for their appearance, leaders emerged who were naturally pretty, charming and photogenic; this is hardly woman empowerment. The feminist call to neglect one's appearance ended up sifting out a few choice stars who were feminist leaders but strangely attractive, despite feminist rhetoric to not care about one's appearance, which turned out to be a hypocrisy. 
 
Gloria Steinham has been praised for her prettiness, showing a good face for otherwise abrasive feminism, and such praise just proves my point.
 
Date rape was another amorphous evil that loomed over us - til I wondered, well why don't people just not date in dangerous situations? Why do they go to parties, drink alcohol, listen to suggestive music, and start sex play? I was not allowed to voice these questions, because that would be blaming the victim. 
 
It would be empowering, actually, to question date culture that leads to rape culture.

Then in college I met the Christians. They did not party. Some refrained from alcohol and dancing like traditional Jews and Muslims refrain from pork. They certainly had strong opinions, and they differed among themselves regarding theology, but they had a quiet confidence that faith bequeaths.
 
Their quiet, low profile presence was in stunning contrast to the propaganda I had been raised with which turns you into a social soldier for amorphous battles that can never be won.
 
I engaged with the Christians, argued, and they were unfailingly patient and respectful, which the liberal left is decidedly not.
I cannot thank the example of those Christians I met in college enough.
 
The liberal left wants you to be a programmed bitter soldier for amorphous causes that can never be complete. This dynamic harms you internally and inter-personally.
 
Resist it.