Saturday, April 30, 2022

"It's No Big Deal" - the modern leftist deception

 Human beings crave intellectual honesty.

You will find a trend in the liberal/left that defies intellectual honesty, and it runs like this: "here is a social revolution, actually it is No Big Deal."

Wait, how can you have a social revolution that is No Big Deal?

Here are some examples:

The 1960's heralded the sexual revolution. People could be affectionate outside the shackles of marriage. Freedom! This led to broken hearts, unwanted pregnancies, and an inability to nurture devoted and committed relationships, but that was not foreseen by the liberators. 

Then people claimed that, not to worry, sex is No Big Deal.

Roe v Wade declared abortion rights for women in the USA, actually if you read the wording, those rights depend on the personhood of the unborn, and technology now shows that personhood begins rather early, but, back in 1974, Roe v Wade won.

Then people who support "choice" declared, the unborn is not alive, it is No Big Deal. And the feminist who took the abortion pill on air in early 2022 to make that point, in defiance of even other feminists who hold that the decision to abort should at least be made gravely, underscored this aspect of the shaky intellectual ground of - let's have a revolution, actually it is No Big Deal.

The group that calls itself Women of the Wall say that they are fighting for prayer equality at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. They also say, in the very same breath, that the Western Wall has no sanctity.

So they are fighting for equality and at the same time saying that the area has no sanctity, so this is all No Big Deal.

I believe that those who are in homosexual relationships should of course have full civil rights and be allowed to adopt children. I also have found some inconsistencies in the argument that homosexuality is constitutional and inherent, but, fine, that has nothing to do with civil rights.

But if I challenge a liberal when they say, "Being gay is just fine because they are born that way," by retorting that perhaps sexuality can be influenced, they quickly get intellectually fuzzy and say, "well it really is No Big Deal."

Took me a while to identify the intellectual quagmire of the modern leftist liberal. From revolution to - ah this is No Big Deal. 

Which means they really did not seek revolution after all.



Friday, April 29, 2022

Human-centered language may be needed in order to raise awareness in the issue of abortion

We do not need rules for everything.

Christians may misunderstand Jewish legalism, which is merely human-centered language.

This came to a head in our history regarding the relationship between Jewish and ancient Greek thought. The world benefited from many things Greek including discourse, mathematics, astrology, etc.

But the Greeks scoffed at the Rabbis of the Talmud for declaring that the circumference divided by the diameter of a circle is 3. A round number, merely 3, is something we can comprehend.

The Greeks say the circumference divided by the diameter of a circle is pi, that is, 3.1415....a number that reaches until infinity, to perfection.

How silly of those Rabbis, thought the Greeks, they should have known what pi is! Well the Rabbis did know, they simply phrased things in human-centered terms, whereas the Greeks defined down to the sub atomic scale, which is beyond human comprehension.

It may be more useful to think that the mathematics of a circle is 3 rather than a number we cannot comprehend.

If you emphasize the wrongness of a subset of actions, you can succeed in sensitizing people to the wrongness of actions that are connected to that subset.

Regarding reproduction, Jewish law weighs in on two fronts: contraception is only allowed in  some circumstances, some forms are considered to be immoral, and at forty days after conception, the unborn is a full human being. That is five weeks and five days.  Sex outside of marriage is forbidden.

Before 40 days, the unborn is considered to be "like water." 

On the surface this challenges those who hold that life begins at conception, but think for a minute: human beings cannot comprehend either the size of the universe or that of an atom. Tell people that it is a baby at conception, thus abortion must be forbidden even from conception - people cannot comprehend that, so they will dismiss the pro life argument entirely.

But, if you express concepts in human-centered terms, meaning, "see this picture of an embryo at six weeks? You can comprehend that this is a human baby, albeit tiny. To remove it from the womb can only be done in severe, life-threatening cases." That is comprehensible.

If, likewise, you live in a community in which women have their first baby on average a year after they marry, as happens in orthodox Jewish communities, due to restrictions on birth control usage, you see that babies are a normal part of life. 

Put the two together, and you have a language and culture concerning reproduction in which people become sensitized to the sanctity of life on an ongoing basis, then, abortion becomes unthinkable even immediately upon conception.

Ultra-orthodox young women attend seminaries after high school, usually a teacher's college paired with another major, and they often marry say one year into college, and start bearing children.  These colleges are used to accommodating the young mother. 

This is an example of a pro-life society: babies are part of life, so colleges must accommodate.

Sometimes you need to use language that is human-centered in order to raise awareness and sensitize people, getting them to a higher ground.

So, if laws allow abortion only up to the detection of the heartbeat, which is, interestingly enough, at about 6 weeks, (about 40 days - maybe those Rabbis were not so silly, eh?) this WILL lead to saving all babies, because you have sensitized, using human-centered language.

Btw - "like water" connotes flexibility and high-speed change. There is a tradition that this is the best time to pray for the health of the child. This never meant that the unborn, before 40 days, is not living. How could that be, when both sperm and egg are living and must be respected, leading to restrictions on birth control.

The orthodox make no move to render illegal forms of birth control that they hold are immoral. This may be due to their reticence to get involved in the wider world, or just the idea that once people are sensitized, laws on the books are not so necessary. 

Another example of no-need-for-a-rule is the social pressure to complete high school before meeting a matchmaker to set up a meeting for the possibility of marriage. There is no law against marrying at say 16 in our community, but it is so discouraged, via social pressure, that it is quite rare. 

You do not need rules for everything. You do need enough social sensitization that abortion, even if legal until 6 weeks, would be unthinkable.



Monday, April 25, 2022

Cherish America School Part II - internal fault lines that led to Leftist intrusion

 21,056 Vermont Stock Photos, Pictures & Royalty-Free Images - iStock

 

The following is a true story,  details changed slightly to protect privacy.

 

“Welcome to our second class of ‘Cherish America School’, today we have two student presentations, the first shows how we got to the extreme state of separation between religion and state in the public schools, the second highlights the importance of religious freedom and freedom of speech.”

 

Nell rises and strides to the front of the class.

 

“My name is Nell Keeler, I am named for my grandmother Cornelia. Our family lived in Vermont for a couple of generations, before that one branch hailed from Massachusetts, another from New York state. My roots in America go back to 1627, when my ancestor, John Bridge, came from Cambridge England, settled in the new colony that would later become Cambridge Massachusetts, and was one of the founders of Harvard College.  You can see a statue of him in Cambridge Common, and I have a copy of the Bridge genealogy, which was published in about 1920 by a cousin who was proud of the Bridge heritage. 

"Back then, it was okay to be proud of inheriting the legacy of the pilgrims and puritans.

"The Bridge genealogy lists prominent New England families, including the Hastings, who fled England and settled in Massachusetts and Connecticut. They fled because the Hastings family had a strong claim to the English throne. Queen Elizabeth the first actually had a flimsy claim for two reasons - her father’s father, Henry the seventh, was not royal, he married Elizabeth of York after killing Richard the third, and English royalty is passed through the father. Her claim was flawed also because she was considered illegitimate by both the Catholic and Protestant clergy, so, others who had a stronger claim fled for their lives, those others included the Grey and Hastings families.

 "But there was more than just seeking refuge, members of the Hastings, Bridge, Philips, and Keeler families were fed up with the corruption that they witnessed in both the Catholic and Protestant churches in England, and with the infighting that got murderous. They sought religious freedom in the sense that every one can follow his or her conscience with no interference from others. My great great great grandfather was a wandering preacher in the late 1800’s at a time when some Christians anticipated a cataclysmic end of times.

"So my forebears were devout Christians, but were strongly opposed to any imposing across denominational lines. They promoted tolerance for all -  I have to admit that this tolerance did not extend to Catholicism, however. Still, one could have an opinion about another denomination or even sect, but never, never impose, and even if one criticized Catholicism, one would never criticize a Catholic for his faith to his face. 'The harmony of the social group must remain intact.'

"I feel that the members of my extended family, the remnant of the New England WASP, did not realize how much society would change. They were not prepared to defend their culture against inroads from the Left, in fact, they had some fertile ground for those inroads to take root.

"That fertile ground was the value in favoring a laissez-faire attitude towards religion, a hands-off approach, as if the memory of the bloody infighting in 16th and 17th century England was still fresh in their minds, and to be avoided at all cost. The assumption was this if people would discuss religion, conflict would follow. 

"That cost turned out to be the loss of our culture, and here is one example of how it began.

"My mother, Minnie, named after my great great grandmother Minerva Philips, who is buried in the cemetery in Vergennes, Vermont, came home from school in the fourth grade, 1947, by then they lived in a small town in Ohio, and said that that day’s religious study included the guest teacher saying that you can have a relationship with Jesus.

"First of all, in the public school I grew up in, Brookline Massachusetts, in the 1970’s and early 80’s, religion was not allowed to be mentioned, but you see here that actually there had been religious instruction in public schools until the early 1950’s. It stopped due to lawsuits that went to the Supreme Court that then ruled that public domains cannot have religious discussion or display. 

 Are there holes in the Constitution? - Harvard Law Today

 

"So my grandmother, with the value of tolerance, no imposing across denominational lines, and assuming that society was more stable than it really was, complained to the school that this guest teacher’s statement was an imposition. It was too charismatic a form of Christianity, which was specific to particular denominations. Grandma complained that religious instruction should be the shared concepts, not the particular ones that other denominations do not agree with. My mom said that besides that incident, religious instruction in public school addressed kindness, charity, forgiveness,forbearance, basically the life skills you learn from the Bible.

"What made an impression on me was two things - one, the fact that public school did indeed have some religious instruction, which did indeed make kids into kinder people. And two - the conflict between endless pluralism and the preservation of values.

"My grandmother could not have anticipated that the lack of unity among Christians in the USA would create an unstable ground for those from the Left who seek to destabilize it further. When religious instruction was banned in public schools, no one from my extended family raised an objection.

"If members of New England WASP culture had realized that Christian infighting of a different kind - not bloody persecutions, but bickering and stopping the others’ voice, would lead to a cynical nihilism and a make the remnants of what built America begin to self destruct, they may have better tolerated other points of view within the Christian world.

"My hope is to restore basic religious instruction in public schools, of course this can be expanded to include other religions, emphasizing the values that give people life skills. But this time around I would warn parents, please - tolerance means forbearance and patience, not preventing the expression of concepts you do not hold by."

The teacher was silent. Then she spoke and said, "it is really hard to hear how we sort of 'shot ourselves in the foot', but recognizing our fault lines that allowed incursions from those who would destroy us is an important first step in healing America."

 

-----

The above is an absolutely true story, including the Bridge genealogy and the story of the Hastings and Grey families. Bickering among Christians led to inroads - and to one descendant who saw no future, and embraced orthodox Judaism. It was the only way she could cleave to a scripture and Constitution - the Bible - that had been robbed from her by the very people who should have preserved it, but could not foresee that their bickering would lead to collapse.

Pray for America. Restore the awareness of the biblical roots of modern political science. Defend it! And please - NO MORE BICKERING. Christians will have to lay aside their differences lest a worse phenomenon follow.

 

Next essay  - Why is Ahmed attending Cherish America School? His story of being the grandson of a Bedouin sheikh who fled his country because he was threatened for teaching that the prophet Muhammad loved all people, even the hypocrite. And so Ahmed too loves America.

 

Wednesday, April 13, 2022

A Plea to College Students: Build your character and career! Avoid the modern liberal call to seek injustice where it does not even exist.

As a student, if you obsess about race and gender and social injustice you will actually NOT have the skills to fix social problems in your adulthood.

Do this instead during your precious student years:

You can build yourself into something! Here is how: 

A -Educate yourself so that you can offer something that is unique, that people will seek:

1 - Amass knowledge in a specialized area that people need. This could be in any realm:

 a - a sub-specialty in a profession such as law or the medical field, which takes years of academic study and practice.  Example - physical therapy with a sub-specialty in children's rehabilitation. Nursing with a sub-specialty in public health. Legal services with a sub-specialty in family law.

There are topics that take fewer years of academic study:

b - a special branch of finance

c - a special branch of physical fitness

d - a special branch of music therapy

You can even have a job that "pays the bills" and develop something unique on the side. Your job does not have to express all of your abilities. Here are some example:

a - Day job: secretarial work. In the evenings, creative art or music

b - Day job: construction work. In the evenings, write children's books on a specific topic, go to the library and research what is needed, read voraciously, and produce books for children say on nature, on health, on a sub-specialty of history.

c - Day job - homemaker/housewife. When kids are at school, read up on finance and investing and be a resource for your community. Or, read up on abuse in the home and be a liaison for abuse victims to get help.

While you are at it, a secretary or construction worker can develop a sub-specialty in that career. Do some reading on what is needed.

B - It is essential that you see yourself as a team player, as part of a greater whole, as working to make the entire organization succeed. 

a - Review religious teachings in all the major religions about forgiveness, patience, forbearance, and loving one's neighbor. You cannot be looking for racism, prejudice and microaggressions and get along with people! If something does come up at work, like, "you Jews are sharp, you make the best lawyers, my lawyer is Jewish and he is a whip." Gently say, "You know, you may not want to say that in the office setting, it may offend." No need to bear a grudge! 

Or, here is another that happened to me, "I am a Nazi, I resent the Jewish religion because no one can join it, it is a race. Anyone can embrace Jesus just by going down on one knee and accepting him as saviour." I corrected him on that point, I said we have converts, and I heard him out on his criticisms against the state of Israel. He ended with, "I really appreciated that you listened. Can I give you a hug?"

Give leeway to people, make allowances. Many of your professors have positions in which they decidedly DO NOT need to get along with others. I witnessed two emotionally abusive professors at Middlebury College, late 1980's and realized that these people are the opposite of how to be to get along in the real world. 

Build yourself into something unique, that people will seek. Love your fellow. All the rest is commentary, which every major religion will provide for you, so read up on the tradition you inherited regarding loving one's fellow. You do not have to be devout to read religious teachings.

How I suffered in my liberal youth:

In the liberal society I grew up in, 1970's and 80's, Brookline, Mass, we were expected to debate political and social issues. Scant attention was paid to one's life skills or basic needs.

I embraced a traditional lifestyle in my late teens and am now an orthodox Jew. I am constantly amazed at how much I lost, growing up liberal.

We were groomed to be activists, and you cannot be happy and an activist - groomed to be on the alert for social injustice and thus in a state of agitation, neurotic almost.

In contrast, traditional people are family oriented, they focus their energy on how they will build a strong family, and in that vein, build themselves to be team players in a strong family and community unit. This means they improve their personal characteristics and career choice regarding what will benefit them as a wife and mother, as husband and father.

I did not get the tools I needed to live from liberals.  During the time I embraced tradition, my liberal friends and acquaintances chose to debate me. I now reflect on what a critical time of life that was for me - I needed advice on my career and interpersonal skills, not a debate as to whether religion is sexist or not.

I continue to live a traditional lifestyle, and mourn at all the obtuseness and obsessions in the liberal world - college kids are obsessed with race and gender and the injustice of it all. They are not spending that precious time building their character and career skills, during these critical years that they will never get back.


Modern Liberal Culture will not Bequeath the Skills you Need

 Modern liberal culture will not bequeath the skills you need

You need to judge others favorably, give leeway, overlook others' shortcomings, forgive, and work like a team player, seeing the bigger picture of the good of the organization you are part of at the time.

All three Abrahamic religions teach forbearance, judging favorably, loving one's fellow, and forgiveness.

Being on the lookout for so called  "micro-aggressions" in simple questions like, "where are you from?" or the like, is to stoke an unforgiving paranoia in people that robs them of their ability to love one's fellow. Seeking racism, subconscious bias and ulterior motives in others is to judge others unfavorably before giving them a chance, and violates basic religious teachings.

 From the Old Testament:

Rabbi Akiva taught: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’ (Leviticus 19:18). This is the most important rule in the Torah. (Jerusalem Talmud Nedarim 30b)

From the New Testament: 

Colossians 3:13 "Make allowance for each other's faults, and forgive anyone who offends you. Remember, the Lord forgave you, so you must forgive others."

 From the Qur'an: “The person who treats others kindly and thinks well of them, will find that his intention will remain true, he will feel at ease, his heart will be sound and Allah will protect him from evil and calamity.”

Seeking ill intent in others violates religious teachings, and also hurts the one who thinks in these terms.

You may indeed be uncomfortable in a college or work setting, that does not mean that others are racist or aggressive. Seek the good in others, grant leeway, make allowances.

You will be both righteous and happier.

 


Saturday, April 9, 2022

Liberals cry for help in a hundred different ways.

 "Why don't the orthodox recognize ME as a Rabbi?"

S Cohen, rabbi of the conservative movement, asked me that with passion, anger and even hurt.

This was after a talk he gave at Middlebury College, 1988.

I retorted, "do you believe that God gave the Torah?"

"How can I", he began, his manner felt coarse and scoffing, and I felt the need to back away from him, "when the Torah says that 70 Jews crossed into Egypt and when you count the names it adds up to 69!" 

He was not really asking a question, but making a statement, and contemptuously so.

"I'll take that as a no," I responded, "and you just answered your own question."

What amazed me is that he wanted validation from rabbis who are not only wrong (in his mind) about their belief in the divinity of Torah, but also wrong in a ignorant way that can be so easily disproven that he expressed total contempt for them. Not, say, "I know that the orthodox feel that the Torah is divine and have many reasons to think so, but I simply disagree, and here are my reasons."

Nope.

He could disprove them (so he claimed) in half a verse in thirty seconds.

Yet he still yearned for their validation.

At that time, he was a professor at Brown university...and was still looking over his shoulder. 

Part of me pitied him, and it led me to ponder that:

Liberals cry for help in a hundred different ways. 

They remain insecure and tormented. 

You may want to bail out. I did.


----

Off topic:

ps He also declared that the Nida laws are because men fear menstruation. Um, what about the sexual liberation movement? Please forward to me any literature that reflects that during that movement, beginning in the 1960's, men expressed any sentiments that indicated that they feared women's periods. And, do date-rapists give pause and ponder whether their next victim will be menstruating? 

The tormented imagine falsehoods in a hundred different ways.

Monday, April 4, 2022

Women for the Wall

Women for the Wall

I found this buried in the Wikipedia Women for the Wall page, and since it has been covered up by subsequent editors, I am posting it here.

—–

The conservative Women for the Wall, sometimes abbreviated as W4W, is a grassroots organization founded in April 2013, concerned with preserving Jewish tradition at the Western Wall, also known as the Kotel.[1][2] The catalyst for the founding of Women for the Wall was lack of representation for the stand of traditional Jewish women in the controversy surrounding an alternative prayer group known as Women of the Wall (WoW). In the months leading to the establishment of W4W, Women of the Wall demanded to hold their services in the traditional women’s section, rather than the Robinson’s Arch area of the Kotel, where alternative prayer services are held.[3] The number of women who pray at Women of the Wall (WoW) services has been estimated to be between 50 and 180.[4]

Contents

History

W4W was founded in April 2013 by Ronit Peskin, Leah Aharoni, and Jenni Menashe. Their first event was held on Rosh Chodesh (the first day of the Hebrew month of) Sivan (May 10, 2013) with some 5,000 – 7,000 Jewish women praying traditionally, filling up Kotel plaza, and outnumbering the WoW group.[5] On 6 June 2013, Women for the Wall founders Ronit Peskin and Leah Aharoni explained their views at Media Central in a press conference, followed by a briefing from Women of the Wall members.[2][6]

Since then, aside for Rosh Chodesh Tammuz (June 9, 2013), when the police closed access for orthodox worshipers to the Old City of Jerusalem and barred them from entry into Kotel Plaza[citation needed], W4W has held prayer services attended by thousands of women on every first day of the Hebrew month.

In 2013 the Government of Israel considered for the first time changing its policy towards endorsing traditional forms of prayer for women at the Western Wall, Judaism Holiest Site. This opened up a debate in the Israeli media and the diaspora on the nature of the Government’s role at the Site, and whether the site itself was a Public or Religious site.

Rationale

The founders of Women for the Wall claim a need for their organization for reasons that fall into various categories.

Sacred Space vs a Public Place

Alternative prayer groups including Women of the Wall have challenged the notion that the Western Wall has sanctity, stating that the Kotel is primarily a public place, and “just a wall”.[7] [1][8][9] They have stated that the Kotel should be turned into a national monument and that traditional prayer services, which currently function 24 hours a day, seven days a week, should be limited to three hours each morning; men who pray traditionally should be barred from the Kotel as follows: “For six hours a day the Wall will be a national monument, open to others but not to Orthodox men” [10][11] This would take authority over religious places away from the Rabbinate and grant it to the secular court system, as occured in April 2013 when a secular court overruled the Rabbinate and allowed WoW into the traditional section. [12] Anat Hoffman said on Israel’s Channel 2: “I definitely see that the day will come when people will tell you: You know what? There was a time… no, you don’t remember this, but there was a time when there used to be a mechitzah here all the time! You don’t believe it….”[13]

Based on the compromise set forth by the Israeli High Court of Justice in 2003, alternative prayer groups function at the Robinson’s Arch section.[3][14] Leah Aharoni writes, “The Israeli High Court suggested a compromise allowing WoW to pray just a few feet down the same exact wall at what is called Robinson’s Arch, and the Israeli government invested $2.5 million in repairing the site, a generous move considering the group’s minuscule size. WoW has rejected the solution.”[8] Women Of the Wall (WoW) spokeswomen have stated that they wish to relocate from the Robinson’s Arch section to the traditional women’s section in order to influence traditional women to join the WoW group, demand changes from their Rabbis, remove the mechitza (separation between women and men) for most of the day, and make changes in Israeli society concerning marriage, divorce, conversion and burial.[15] [13][16]

Using the Western Wall for political activism

Women for the Wall opposed the use of the Kotel for political activism, since it is a place of consensus both in Israeli society and for Diaspora Jewry.[17] Although the WoW group has been in existance for 25 years, its recent catapult into world-wide fame has been theorized as due to the Israeli left seeking a cause celebre to use as leverage against the Israeli leadership and public: “this (leftist) elite is longing for some outside force ‘who will limit the powers of the elected political leadership we loathe,’ because the left ‘has lost the ability to act within the parameters of democracy and absorb the principle of majority rule.'” [18] This has fomented discussion concerning the contrast between activism, in which a small minority of vocal activists attempt to change society, versus democracy, which promotes majority rule; and on the role that secular courts play in religious issues: “…disputes over religion-state relationships have increasingly been played out in the judicial sphere, with social activists attempting to effectuate change…through the courts.” [19] Leah Aharoni has said, “It’s unthinkable for a small group to upset tradition against the overwhelming majority.”[20]

Women of the Wall spokeswomen have declared that traditional Judaism is controlled by Rabbis and that alternative prayer in the traditional women’s section will result in traditional women demanding change from their Rabbis,[16] and that that they wish to “tempt” traditional women into arguments during times of prayer.[21] Onlookers have claimed that both women and men’s prayer have been disrupted by WoW.[22] On Friday October 4, Women of the Wall’s chazzanit [female cantor] used a microphone to lead the WoW group in loud singing, allegedly disturbing the services of 15,000 worshippers. [23]Rabbi Susan Silverman, a WoW supporter, admitted that she and her daughter provoked the police in order to get arrested at the Kotel.[24] Women for the Wall founders have requested that those who synpathize with the political aims of WoW should take their efforts to government bodies and not to Judaism’s holiest site[25] [26]

In November 2013 it was revealed by journalist Rachel Avraham that WoW leaders are active in the following political groups: Sikkuy, a signator to the Haifa Declaration, which among other activities calls for abolishing the state of Israel and supports violent resistance; the left-wing groups Adalah, Ir Amin, Yesh Din, and Mossawa; Al Aqsa Grassroots, which opposes the Judaization of Jerusalem and supports the Palestinian right of return to Israel proper – within the green armistice line of 1967; Women in Black, a which advocates giving all of Judea and Samaria, as well as eastern Jerusalem – which includes the area of the Western Wall, or Kotel – to the Palestinian Authority. In light of the participation of WoW leaders in these and other related political groups, WoW spokeswoman Shira Pruce stated that WoW members “…come from all walks of life, political opinions, and Jewish denominations.” She states in the comments section of Jerusalem Online Magazine that these accusations are slander and libel. She states that members of WoW are patriotic, serve in the army, and pay taxes; another WoW member states in the comments section that some live in settlements over the 1967 armistice green line. [27] [28] [29] The article exposing WoW’s links to these groups first appeared on Jerusalem Online News. Shortly after, it disappeared, and then reappeared on the Jewish Press. It has been postulated that the article’s disappearance is due to Avraham’s claim that “Women of the Wall continues to threaten news publications that have the audacity to present these facts to the public.” [30]

Attitude towards sacred objects

Women for the Wall supporters note that the use of religious objects involves a level of religious commitment that is not evident among the members of alternative prayer groups.[31] To don tefillin and demand use of the Torah scroll[32] by those who are publicly admitting that they do not keep the commandments written therein is at best problem of conscience, and at worst a desecration of holy items.[33] Alternative prayer groups have been filmed provoking traditionalists,[22] blowing kisses at traditional men with the support of Women of the Wall chairwomen Anat Hoffman,[34] shouting, waving their prayer books in the air, and bringing television crews to film their activities; this is seen as further provocation.[35]

Alternative Jewish prayer groups and their attitude towards traditional women

Susan Aronoff, one of the founders of WoW, praised Haredi women’s prayer, saying, “The women of WoW also benefit from proximity to haredi women at prayer. Hearing haredi women cry to God, praise God, and address God in the direct and personal way they know how to do so well, uplifts others.”.[16] However, in the same article, she admits to the provocative nature of the WoW group, stating, “Like it or not the sights and sounds of women leading services may initially shock them (traditional women)” and that this will lead traditional women to make changes in religious practice. One supporter of WoW writes that traditional women “mouth their words silently” when they pray, and thus think they are holier than others.

Members of Women of the Wall have declined invitations to meet with leaders of Women for the Wall,[6][36] stated that traditional women are following orders from male Rabbis and politicians and not acting of their own accord,[37][38][39][40] have threatened the founders of Women for the Wall with a lawsuit,[1] have referred to a founder of Women for the Wall a “feisty”, which derives from a German word meaning small dog and is almost always used in reference to women, and which the WoW Facebook page states as “Honestly exposing WOW’s ‘opposition'”,[41] have stated that Haredi women do not know Jewish law regarding prayer,[42] and that orthodox Judaism is “repulsive”.[43] One member of WOW stated that at the Kotel she would like to “choose a potential victim to argue with” [21] referring to her desire to argue with a traditional teenage girl.

Shira Pruce, spokeswomen for Women of the Wall (WoW), stated on June 6 when the Women for the Wall group convened, “WoW works 100 percent in the framework of Jewish law… “We are not violating the Torah, and this is not a halachic issue, which numerous prominent rabbis have agreed with. The Western Wall is not an ultra-Orthodox synagogue, it’s a public place – a very important, historic, holy place – but first and foremost, it’s public.” Pruce maintained WoW’s legal right to pray as they choose at the Wall, and advised members of Women for the Wall to pray at private synagogues if they view their freedom of religion as offensive.[44] She stated on July 7, the day before Rosh Chodesh (the first day of the Hebrew month) of Av that she truly welcomes traditional women at the Kotel,.[45] The next day stated, “The women’s section was full of seminary students bussed in for the purpose of blocking out Women of the Wall”.[46] An article in the Forward Magazine stated of the Rosh CHodesh Av gathering, “…the biggest group on hand that morning was a crowd of some 5,000 to 7,000 young women standing silently in the women’s prayer area,… Filling the women’s section and spilling out into the wider plaza, the girls each prayed on their own. When they were done, they left without raising their voices.[47]

One of the founders of Women of the Wall (WoW), Phylis Chesler, compares traditional Jewish women to women who “perform female genital mutilation, murder their daughter-in-laws for their dowries….” She refers to the presence of thousands of seminary girls praying traditionally as “hostile hatred”.[39] WoW spokeswomen have made analogies between the police protection they receive and being led into a ghetto – this Holocaust analogy has been decried even by WoW supporters.[33]

Rabbi Eliana Yolkut states that accepting the Robinson’s Arch section for prayer services would be accepting second class status. “I, a Women of the Wall sympathizer, am not trying to ‘liberate’ you as an Orthodox Jew, but raise my status from second class to equal….We are trying to liberate Judaism from the ties of an Orthodox hegemony.” [48] Anat Hoffman, head of the WoW group, has stated that praying in the Robinson’s Arch section is like being relegated to the back of the bus, that if the Robinson’s Arch area is so holy, the traditional women would be clamoring to pray there, and that she wants be in the traditional women’s section in order to “see and be seen.”[49]

Ronit Peskin and Leah Aharoni, founders of Women for the Wall, challenge the idea that traditional women merely follow orders and subjugated.[50] Leah Aharoni states that rejecting the traditional feminine experience of Judaism is itself mysogynous: “There is nothing more demeaning to women than positioning the traditionally male experience as the only one worth living and setting up women for an ongoing game of catch-up.” She goes on to say that Judaism in fact validates and empowers women.[50] She points out the essential difference between traditional and alternative forms of Judaism: traditional Jews believe that the Torah is a divine document, not invented or controlled by Rabbis, whereas members of alternative Jewish groups do not believe in the divinity of the Torah and thus feel that Jewish practice can be changed on demand.[51] Sara Conway, neuropsychologist and mother of four, states that traditional women do indeed think for themselves and make autonomous decisions, “It is my personal belief that Torah Judaism, including its belief in separate but complementary gender roles and a more spiritually inward role for women, is the best choice for me and my family.”[52][53]

Members of the alternative Women of the Wall (WoW) group claim to be feminists. Leading feminists have noted that some western liberal feminists have degraded women who are traditional, women of color, and women of third world cultures. The following quotes are culled from an essay that elaborates on this phenomenon:

Gloria Anzaldúa explains the dangers of failing to acknowledge racial and cultural differences: “The tendency to downplay differences has long been part of mainstream feminism…. Excluded groups have had to fight for inclusion within the liberal humanist project of liberty and equality.” Chandra Mohanty’s influential essay ‘Under Western Eyes’ (1991) challenges white feminist portrayals of third world women as “victims of male control and of traditional cultures” whereas in fact, she states, “they have both voice and agency” within their respective traditional cultures. Cherríe Moraga: “Within the women’s movement, the connections among women of different backgrounds…has been fragile, at best. I think this phenomenon is indicative of our failure to seriously address ourselves to some very frightening questions: (including)…How have I oppressed?”[54]

Women For The Wall leaders and their attitude toward alternative prayer

Founders of Women for the Wall have stated that they support alternative prayer at the Robinson’s Arch section of the Kotel.[6] They have requested meetings with leaders of Women of the Wall, who have declined.[36] W4W leaders state that their objection is to the imposition of alternative prayer and associated political agendas on traditional women, plus their desire to confront and shock them, at Judaism’s holiest site .[2] “Don’t forget, Women FOR the Wall is not asking you to change. They are asking you not to change them.”[55] Ronit Peskin has stated concerning traditional women, “We want to come and pray peacefully, and you (The Women of the Wall group that insist on praying in the traditional women’s section and not at Robinson’s Arch) are disrupting the prayers of other women around you.” [1] Leaders of W4W have condemned any show of verbal or phsycal violence by orthodox Jews against WoW and their supporters.[47][55][56] The ongoing efforts of W4W to role model peaceful, silent prayer, plus their calls to the orthodox to refuse to respond to provocations have decreased heated reactions from the orthodox camp;[47] the Forward magazine described the gathering at the Kotel on October 4, 2013, (Rosh Chodesh Cheshvan) “the calmest prayer service in months”.[57]

The Western Wall, or Kotel

Main article: Western Wall

The Western Wall served as the retaining wall of the first and second Temple. According to tradition, its sanctity is two-fold – it is the closest spot on earth to the location of the first and second Temples that we are allowed to access. Tradition holds that there are areas of the Temple Mount which are forbidden for any Jew in a state of ritual impurity to traverse. Since we do not have a Temple now, we cannot expunge ritual impurity, thus should a Jew walk atop the Temple Mount, he or she may be defiling certain sacred areas. In addition to the proximity to the Temple Mount, tradition holds tha the Western Wall was built by donations made by the poor of Israel and that such self-sacrifice confers a special protection to the site. The Temple Mount is now the location of the Al Aksa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock. In Islamic tradition, Mohammed ascended to heaven from the Temple Mount.

Access to the Western Wall

Throughout history, access to the Western Wall has been limited by the controlling political power of the time. Under the British Mandate, Jews were not allowed to bring chairs to the Kotel, nor could they put up a mechitza in order to separate between men and women and conduct traditional services. After the Kotel’s capture from the Kingdom of Jordan in the Six Day War of 1967, part of the southern area next to the Kotel was cleared of abandoned Arab homes that had all but hid the place, and traditional worship was restored. Women of the Wall have been criticized as unwitting allies in ignoring the destruction of these homes and in supporting the Wall as a symbol of Israeli nationalism.[58] Most of the Western wall runs the length of East Jerusalem, with the Temple Mount to the east and dwellings to the west.

Non-Traditional Jewish Worship at the Kotel

Women of the Wall was founded at the first International Jewish Women’s Feminist Conference in Jerusalem in 1988. Conservative and Reform prayer groups held prayer services in the late 1990s. An agreement was reached that non-traditional forms of prayer would be held at Robinson’s arch, which is the first part of the Western Wall as seen from the entrance at the Dung Gate. In April 2013, Women of the Wall stepped up its legal activism and entered the traditional women’s section of the wall wearing tefillin, tzitzit, which traditionally are commanded upon Jewish men, and singing loudly. WoW had a $52,000 grant from the New Israel Fund in 2012 with an additional 10,000 shekel grant in 2013.[59][60]

References


Eisenbud, Daniel K. (2013-05-13). “Traditional women challenge Women of the Wall | JPost | Israel News”. JPost. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Remarks to MediaCentral Press Briefing”. Women for the Wall. 2013-06-06. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Women for the Wall Takes On Women of the Wall – The Sisterhood – Forward.com”. Blogs.forward.com. 2013-05-06. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Rachel Ginsberg. “Up Against the Wall”. Mishpacha.com. Retrieved 2013-09-16. “‘Women of the Wall’ Prepare for Second Round – Inside Israel – News”. Israel National News. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Women For the Wall briefing on Vimeo”. Vimeo.com. 2013-06-06. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://shma.com/2013/10/women-at-the-wall-an-agent-of-contention/ Aharoni, Leah. “Women of the Wall’s collateral damage | Opinion”. Jewish Journal. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Opinion/Think-Again-Sincerity-is-not-enough-310254“Hoffman voices support for Western Wall plan – Sun Sentinel”. Articles.sun-sentinel.com. 2013-04-24. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Women of the Wall Demand Equal Rights – CNN iReport”. Ireport.cnn.com. 2013-07-14. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/women-of-the-sit-in/http://womenforthewall.org/wow-in-their-own-words/“Bennett: Come Visit non-Orthodox Kotel Section – Jewish World – News”. Israel National News. 2013-08-26. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Whats-wrong-with-Women-of-the-Wall-322125 Woolf, Jeffrey (2013-05-07). “Sharing the sacred Kotel space | Susan Aranoff | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://shma.com/2013/10/women-at-the-wall-an-agent-of-contention/http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/provocation-at-the-wall/http://www.gov.harvard.edu/files/Liviatan-AJICL.pdfhttp://jhvonline.com/a-showdown-at-the-western-wall-p15523-97.htm“Talking to the Wall”. Womenofthewall.org.il. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Israel, Ariella. “Women of the Wall: More Harm Than Good? | Moment Magazine”. Momentmag.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/ Basmenachem, Aliza (2013-08-18). “Tradition versus modernity: Women of the Wall | JPost | Israel News”. JPost. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Elianna, Rabbi (2013-05-01). “An open letter to Leah Aharoni, on behalf of religious freedom in Israel – Rabbis’ Round Table Israel News”. Haaretz. Retrieved 2013-09-15. name=”jpost_a”>Peskin, Ronit. “What’s wrong with Women of the Wall? | JPost | Israel News”. JPost. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/women-of-the-wall-leadership-linked-to-anti-israel-groups/2013/11/10/http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/women-of-the-wall-leaders-work-with-anti-israel-groups/http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-women-of-the-wall-a-front-grouphttp://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/173858 Pinhasik, Sadeena (2013-05-29). “Women, the Wall and Judaism | JPost | Israel News”. JPost. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Women of Wall want their own Torah scroll – Israel Jewish Scene, Ynetnews”. Ynetnews.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Levy, Daniel J (2013-08-06). “An open letter to the Women of the Wall | Daniel J Levy | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Women of the Wall: Charge!”. Women for the Wall. 2013-07-25. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “An Arab Israeli woman was offered money to provoke Haredi men in public places, which would be filmed on hidden cameras. She refused to participate”. Israelnationalnews.com. Retrieved 2013-09-16. “Statement on Nonviolence and Pluralism”. Womenofthewall.org.il. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “The High Road at the Western Wall”. Womenofthewall.org.il. 2013-07-21. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Tuttle, Sarah (2013-07-21). “Feminism Has Gotten Me Confused | Ronit Peskin | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Chesler, Phyllis (2013-07-09). “”Mean Girls” at the Western Wall | Phyllis Chesler | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Rival Women’s Groups Feud Over Prayer at Western Wall –”. Forward.com. 2013-07-25. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Iris, Rabbi (2013-05-20). “Woman vs. Women of the Wall – Routine Emergencies Israel News”. Haaretz. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Gellar, Raphael (2013-04-16). “Heart of Stone: Liberating the Wall for women too | Shulamit Magnus | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Peskin, Ronit. “What’s wrong with Women of the Wall? | JPost | Israel News”. JPost. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/Nascent-coalition-challenges-Women-of-the-Wall-312977 Calic, Dan (2013-07-07). “Welcoming Hundreds or Thousands | Shira Pruce | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Press Room”. Womenofthewall.org.il. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Rival Women’s Groups Feud Over Prayer at Western Wall For or of the Wall?”. Forward.com. Retrieved 2013-09-16. “http://www.haaretz.com/an-open-letter-to-leah-aharoni-on-behalf-of-religious-freedom-in-israel.premium-1.518665http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/Rabbis-offer-plan-for-non-Orthodox-prayer-at-Wall Boteach, Shmuley (2013-04-19). “The misogyny of the Women of the Wall | Leah Aharoni | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “Liberal-traditional dialogue with brick wall – Israel Opinion, Ynetnews”. Ynetnews.com. 1995-06-20. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “My Journey Back to the Kotel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-16. “Why I Joined”. Women for the Wall. 2013-08-12. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Weedon, Chris. “Key Issues in Postcolonial Feminism: A Western Perspective” (in Template:De icon). Gender Forum. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Yanklowitz, Shmuly (2013-08-07). “Women AT [of/for] the Wall | Levi Margolin | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel”. Blogs.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. Christa Case Bryant (2013-08-07). “Why new Israeli women’s group opposes feminist activists at the Western Wall (+video)”. CSMonitor.com. Retrieved 2013-09-15. http://forward.com/articles/185017/women-of-wall-hold-calmest-prayer-protest-in-month/http://www.whatsupic.com/news-politics-world/3567-why-i-cannot-stand-with-women-of-the-wall.html“New Israel Fund – 2012 Grantees”. Nif.org. Retrieved 2013-09-15. “NIF Announces Grants to Women of the Wall, Other Religious Pluralism Groups”. Nif.org. Retrieved 2013-09-16.